Dual Agency Issues: The New Depressed Property Law

Real estate agents are concerned about the situation in which they present an offer to buy unlisted property that is being foreclosed.

In that context if the agent says that the owner ought to sell to avoid the foreclosure or something of the sort the agent risks risk being deemed a “distressed home consultant,” and would then have fiduciary obligations to both sides of the transaction, as the agent would with a dual agency. In this situation though there is an inherently strong conflict of interest.

I believe that you would have to have the seller consult with a lawyer of his or her choice and have the seller be independently represented in the sale by the lawyer or an independent agent, perhaps chosen by the lawyer. The seller’s interests would then be protected and in the abstract I believe the agent would probably be deemed to have fulfilled his or her duty to the seller.

I would certainly recommend that even after the seller has independent representation the agent make full disclosure to the other side and maintain the highest level of honesty. I would strictly comply with the other requirements of the new law.

I’m not sure whether the new NWLS forms cover this situation, but it would certainly be appropriate to discuss the details of the situation with a lawyer at that time.

Dual Agency Issues: The New Depressed Property Law

2 thoughts on “Dual Agency Issues: The New Depressed Property Law

  • July 15, 2008 at 4:58 pm
    Permalink

    great articles.

    I agree that Realtors should only say so much. I’m in the business, and you have to watch everything you say. You have to have an attorney involved in the entire process. if not the Realtors can be held liable, and no one wants that.

    Reply
  • July 15, 2008 at 4:58 pm
    Permalink

    great articles.

    I agree that Realtors should only say so much. I’m in the business, and you have to watch everything you say. You have to have an attorney involved in the entire process. if not the Realtors can be held liable, and no one wants that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *